Critical evaluation

While BIGwiki's research on Champions Tactics provides valuable insights into its tokenomics, there are significant gaps that limit the comprehensiveness and robustness of the analysis. The research addresses some key aspects, such as token distribution and blockchain infrastructure, but falls short in critical areas like token utility integration, supply management, and detailed economic modelling. This impacts the reliability of the analysis and our ability to draw comprehensive conclusions about the game's tokenomics framework. The completeness of the research can be classified as **Average**, as it covers the basics but lacks depth in several crucial areas.

• The research lacks detailed information on token utility integration with gameplay, which is critical for assessing how the tokenomics model enhances player engagement and supports long-term sustainability.
  • While the dual-token model (Gold and WOAS) is outlined, there is insufficient analysis of how these tokens are integrated into core gameplay mechanics, such as skill development or matchmaking systems.
  • No information is provided on how token utility might evolve with game updates or expansions, which is crucial for evaluating long-term adaptability.
• The report provides some insights into token distribution but lacks comprehensive coverage of vesting schedules and team allocation strategies, which are essential for evaluating fairness and long-term commitment.
  • While the initial allocation of NFTs to Warlord Holders and Dark List Members is detailed, there is no information on how tokens are allocated to the development team, advisors, or other stakeholders.
  • The absence of a detailed vesting schedule makes it difficult to assess whether team incentives are aligned with long-term project success, raising concerns about potential selling pressure or misaligned priorities.
• The economic design and long-term sustainability of the tokenomics model are underexplored, particularly in terms of inflation control, NFT recycling mechanisms, and dynamic supply adjustments.
  • While Crafting Charges are mentioned as a mechanism to control NFT supply, there is no analysis of potential inflation risks or how the game plans to manage the increasing cost of Forging over time.
  • No information is provided on recycling mechanisms for spent NFTs or how the game might address potential oversupply issues in the marketplace, limiting the ability to assess long-term economic viability.
• The blockchain infrastructure and smart contract analysis, while relatively robust, lack specific technical details on security audits and performance metrics, which are critical for evaluating reliability and scalability.
  • Although the use of Oasys and Aleph.im is highlighted, there is no detailed information on smart contract audits, security vulnerabilities, or risk mitigation strategies.
  • Performance metrics, such as transaction throughput or latency under high load conditions, are not provided, making it difficult to assess whether the infrastructure can support a large and active player base.

Follow-up questions

How does Champions Tactics' token economy address inflation risks, particularly in the NFT marketplace, and what mechanisms are in place to ensure long-term economic stability?

• Without understanding the game's approach to inflation control and NFT recycling, stakeholders cannot evaluate the sustainability of the tokenomics model or its ability to maintain a healthy in-game economy over time.

What are the specifics of Champions Tactics' vesting schedules and team token allocations, and how do these align with long-term project success and stakeholder protection?

• Detailed information on vesting schedules and team allocations is critical for assessing fairness, transparency, and alignment of incentives, which directly impact the project's credibility and long-term viability.

How are Gold and WOAS tokens integrated into the core gameplay mechanics, and how does this integration evolve with game updates or expansions?

• Without a clear understanding of token utility integration, stakeholders cannot fully assess how the tokenomics model enhances player engagement or supports the game's long-term adaptability in the evolving Web3 gaming landscape.

What are the results of the smart contract audits conducted on Champions Tactics' blockchain infrastructure, and how does the game mitigate potential security vulnerabilities?

• Understanding the security measures and audit results is essential for evaluating the reliability of Champions Tactics' smart contracts and ensuring player trust in the game's asset management systems.

How does Champions Tactics' economic design balance accessibility for new players with earning potential for experienced participants, and what safeguards are in place to prevent exploitation?

• Without insights into the game's approach to balancing accessibility and earning potential, stakeholders cannot assess whether the tokenomics model fosters a fair and inclusive gaming environment while preventing economic manipulation or whale dominance.