Game icon

Medieval Empires

MEE

$0

6.16%

65

Chain

    Immutable X
    Polygon

Platform

  • macOS icon
  • PC icon

Category

City Building, Multiplayer, NFT Game, PVE, PVP, Strategy, Turn-based

Allocations & Vesting Schedule for Medieval Empires

Introduction

Token allocation and vesting schedules are critical components of any Web3 game's economic structure, as they directly impact the fairness, transparency, and long-term viability of the project. For Medieval Empires, evaluating these mechanisms is essential to determine whether the project aligns team incentives with long-term success while protecting the interests of other stakeholders. This report will cover:

  • The distribution of tokens among key stakeholders and the implications for fairness.
  • The vesting schedules in place and their alignment with long-term project goals.
  • Any potential risks or red flags in the token allocation and vesting system.

Token Distribution Among Stakeholders

The distribution of tokens in Medieval Empires appears to involve multiple rounds of funding, including seed/private and public rounds, but specific allocation percentages are not detailed in the provided sources. [1a] [1b]

  • Public round allocations constitute 2.9% of the total token distribution, indicating a relatively small portion allocated to the public. [1b]
  • Data on team, advisor, and investor allocations is missing, making it difficult to assess whether the majority of tokens are concentrated among a few stakeholders.

Vesting Schedules and Long-Term Alignment

The sources do not provide explicit details on the vesting schedules for Medieval Empires, making it challenging to evaluate their structure and alignment with long-term goals.

  • There is no indication of whether the vesting schedules use linear, graded, or cliff-based mechanisms.
  • The absence of performance-based unlocks or measures to ensure team commitment during the vesting period cannot be confirmed or analyzed.

Potential Risks and Red Flags

While the sources do not indicate any immediate red flags, the lack of transparency in token distribution and vesting schedules raises concerns about fairness and long-term alignment.

  • The small public round allocation (2.9%) may limit broader community participation, though this does not necessarily indicate unfairness. [1b]
  • Without clear details on team and investor allocations, it is impossible to rule out the possibility of token concentration or dumping risks.

Conclusion

The token allocation and vesting schedule of Medieval Empires remain unclear based on the provided sources, limiting the ability to assess their fairness, transparency, and strategic alignment. While no immediate red flags are evident, the lack of detailed information raises concerns about potential risks and long-term sustainability.

  • Further details on team, advisor, and investor allocations are necessary to evaluate fairness and prevent token concentration.
  • Clarification of vesting schedules, including their structure and alignment with long-term goals, is essential for a comprehensive assessment.

References

[1] medievalempires.com. The flawless and strong Tokenomics design of our game is one of our core strengths. medievalempires.com. Available from: https://medievalempires.com/tokenomics/

 Logo
BETA Version

ověřte si informace sami

Go to top