

Significance
Angelic's community strategy is integral to its success in the Web3 gaming space, focusing on creating an engaging, decentralized, and player-centric ecosystem. The strategy leverages various platforms, including Discord, X (Twitter), and YouTube, to foster community interaction, brand visibility, and player retention. While the strategy shows strengths in community rewards and platform integration, gaps in transparency and platform management persist, potentially impacting long-term sustainability.
- Angelic's Discord server serves as a central hub for player engagement, offering real-time communication, feedback channels, and exclusive events that incentivize participation through Community Points (CP).
- The X (Twitter) account is highly effective in amplifying brand visibility, with frequent updates, community recognition, and visually appealing content that aligns with the game's marketing goals.
- The YouTube channel showcases game features through trailers, gameplay videos, and livestreams, fostering player anticipation and engagement while aligning with the game's development cycle.
- Influencer engagement is supported by a referral program and Community Points system, incentivizing Key Opinion Leaders to promote the game while maintaining alignment with its decentralized vision.
- However, limited transparency in developer-community interactions and gaps in platform management, particularly on Telegram, pose challenges to building trust and long-term player loyalty.
Completeness
While Angelic's community strategy is robust in many areas, the absence of detailed information on specific platforms and developer interactions limits a comprehensive evaluation.
- The role of Telegram in Angelic's community strategy remains underexplored, with no available data on its activity, member count, or content types.
- Specific details about influencer partnerships, including the reach and content of Key Opinion Leaders, are missing, hindering a thorough assessment of their impact.
- Developer interaction with the community lacks transparency, with no specific examples or metrics provided to assess the depth and effectiveness of engagement.