The token allocation for BR1: INFINITE is highly opaque, with no details provided about percentage distribution among team members, advisors, investors, or gamers. This lack of transparency makes it impossible to assess fairness or equity in distribution.
There is no information about the vesting schedule, including whether it is linear, graded, includes a cliff period, or uses performance-based unlocks. This absence of details prevents any evaluation of its alignment with long-term project success.
The lack of transparency and detailed information significantly underperforms industry standards, leaving stakeholders in the dark about critical aspects of the token economy.
No measures are mentioned to prevent token dumping or market manipulation, which raises concerns about the potential for short-term gains at the expense of long-term project stability.
The alignment between token allocation and the game's long-term goals is entirely unclear due to the absence of any substantive information on the topic.
Introduction
Token allocation and vesting schedules are critical components of Web3 games, as they determine how tokens are distributed among stakeholders and ensure long-term alignment of incentives.
In the case of BR1: INFINITE, understanding these mechanisms is essential to assess the fairness, transparency, and strategic soundness of its token economy.
This report will cover:
The extent to which BR1: INFINITE's token allocation is fair and transparent.
The alignment of BR1: INFINITE's vesting schedule with long-term project success.
The current limitations in assessing BR1: INFINITE's token economy due to missing information.
Token Allocation Fairness and Transparency
BR1: INFINITE's token, $BR1, is the core currency used for in-game transactions such as forming teams, opening loot boxes, and upgrading weapons, which highlights its importance in the game's economy.
[1a]However, the sources do not provide specific details about the percentage allocation of tokens among team members, advisors, investors, or gamers, which limits the ability to assess the fairness of the distribution.
The game emphasizes earning tokens through gameplay, but there is no information about how tokens are allocated to the team or early investors.
Without transparency about token distribution, it is difficult to determine if the allocation is equitable or if certain stakeholders hold disproportionate control.
Vesting Schedule and Long-Term Alignment
The sources do not mention any details about BR1: INFINITE's vesting schedule, making it impossible to assess its structure or alignment with long-term project goals.
Key questions about whether the schedule employs a linear or graded approach, includes a cliff period, or uses performance-based unlocks remain unanswered.
The absence of information about the vesting schedule raises questions about how the team's incentives align with the game's long-term success.
Without a clearly defined vesting schedule, it is challenging to determine if investors or team members might dump tokens for short-term gains.
Limitations in Assessing Token Economy
The lack of detailed information about token allocation and vesting schedules significantly limits the ability to evaluate the fairness, transparency, and strategic soundness of BR1: INFINITE's token economy.
Details about the percentage allocation of tokens among stakeholders are not provided, making it impossible to assess fairness.
The absence of information about the vesting schedule prevents an evaluation of its alignment with long-term project success.
Conclusion
Based on the available sources, it is not possible to fully evaluate the fairness, transparency, and strategic soundness of BR1: INFINITE's token allocation and vesting schedule.
The lack of specific details about how tokens are allocated and how the vesting schedule is structured limits the ability to assess these critical aspects of the game's economy.
The game's token economy emphasizes player engagement but lacks transparency about token distribution among key stakeholders.
Without information about the vesting schedule, it is unclear how the team's incentives align with the game's long-term success.
