There are no direct mentions of gaming guilds associated with Champions Tactics or its studio, Ubisoft, which limits the ability to assess their direct role in the game’s ecosystem.
While indirect contributions through partnerships with Web3 entities like Animoca Brands and Oasys suggest potential guild-related benefits, these are speculative and not explicitly tied to Champions Tactics.
The absence of established guilds with active memberships or significant TVL means there is no measurable impact on player engagement, community building, or economic sustainability.
The lack of transparency, scholarship programs, educational resources, or community events organized by guilds further diminishes their potential contribution to the game's ecosystem.
Given the complete absence of direct guild involvement and the speculative nature of indirect benefits, the guilds subsection aligns with the 'Terrible' category in the rubric.
Introduction
Gaming guilds play a pivotal role in the Web3 ecosystem, fostering player engagement, community building, and economic sustainability.
In the context of Champions Tactics, understanding the involvement of guilds is crucial to assessing the game’s potential for success and its integration into the broader Web3 landscape.
This report will cover:
The absence of direct mentions of gaming guilds in the sources.
Indirect contributions through partnerships with Web3 entities like Animoca Brands and Oasys.
[1a][2a]
The potential for guild-related ecosystem benefits despite the lack of explicit information.
No Direct Guild Associations
The sources do not explicitly mention any gaming guilds directly associated with Champions Tactics or its studio, Ubisoft.
This absence of information makes it difficult to assess the direct role of guilds in the game’s ecosystem.
Champions Tactics appears to focus more on direct player engagement and partnerships with Web3 entities rather than guilds.
[1a]
The game’s emphasis on PvP battles and NFT-based champions suggests a design that may not require guilds for player organization.
[3a]
Indirect Contributions Through Partnerships
While no direct guild associations are mentioned, Ubisoft’s partnerships with Web3 leaders like Animoca Brands and Oasys may indirectly support guild-related ecosystem growth.
[1a][2a]These partnerships could facilitate guild involvement through broader Web3 ecosystems, even if not explicitly tied to Champions Tactics.
Animoca Brands, a partner of Ubisoft, has investments in Yield Guild Games, a prominent gaming guild.
[1d]
Oasys, a blockchain partner for Champions Tactics, includes Yield Guild Games as a validator, suggesting potential guild-related ecosystem benefits.
[2a]
Potential Guild-Related Ecosystem Benefits
Even without direct guild associations, the partnerships and ecosystem surrounding Champions Tactics suggest potential for guild-related benefits.
These benefits could include enhanced player engagement, community building, and economic sustainability.
Guilds like Yield Guild Games could leverage their expertise to onboard new players and foster community engagement within the Champions Tactics ecosystem.
[2a]
The integration of Champions Tactics into Mocaverse’s Web3 Frequent Player Program could provide guild-like benefits, such as rewards and exclusive access.
[1a]
Conclusion
While no direct gaming guilds are explicitly associated with Champions Tactics, the game’s partnerships with Web3 leaders like Animoca Brands and Oasys suggest potential indirect guild-related ecosystem benefits.
[1a][2a]These partnerships could facilitate player engagement, community building, and economic sustainability, even if guilds are not directly involved.
The absence of direct guild mentions limits a definitive assessment of their role in Champions Tactics.
Further information on guild involvement and their specific contributions would enable a more comprehensive analysis.
