The token allocation is distributed fairly among various stakeholders, with significant portions dedicated to ecosystem development, player incentives, and marketing, which aligns with the project's long-term goals.
The 15% allocation to the team and advisors is within a reasonable range for Web3 games, indicating a fair approach to token distribution.
However, the lack of detailed information on the vesting schedule raises concerns about transparency and long-term commitment, which is a significant drawback.
There is no mention of performance-based unlocks or innovative vesting features that encourage long-term commitment, which would be expected in an excellent or good allocation strategy.
The absence of details on vesting periods, cliff durations, and measures to prevent token dumping limits the ability to assess the fairness and strategic soundness of the vesting schedule.
Introduction
Token allocation and vesting schedules are critical components of Web3 game economies, ensuring fair distribution and long-term alignment of stakeholder incentives.
In the case of My Neighbor Alice, the token allocation appears to be strategically designed to support various aspects of the game's ecosystem.
[1a]This report will cover:
The breakdown of token allocation among stakeholders
[1a]
The transparency and fairness of the allocation
The strategic alignment of the allocation with long-term project goals
Token Allocation Breakdown
My Neighbor Alice has a total token supply of 100 million ALICE tokens, distributed across several categories:
[1a]
Launchpool: 3%, aimed at early engagement and distribution.
[1d]
Private Sale: 21%, allocated to early investors.
[1e]
Public Sale: 0.8%, providing broader access to the token.
[1f]
Ecosystem: 17.2%, dedicated to game development and infrastructure.
[1g]
Play to Earn: 8%, incentivizing player participation and engagement.
[1h]
Marketing: 15%, aimed at promoting the game and attracting users.
[1i]
Team and Advisors: 15%, allocated to founding and non-founding members.
[1j]
Foundation: 20%, reserved for future use and strategic initiatives.
[1k]
Transparency and Fairness
The token allocation appears to be distributed fairly among various stakeholders, including the team, investors, and players:
[1a]
The team and advisors hold 15% of the tokens, which is within a reasonable range for Web3 games.
Players are incentivized through the 8% allocation to Play to Earn, which encourages active participation in the game.
[1h]
However, the lack of detailed information on the vesting schedule for team and advisor tokens raises concerns about transparency and long-term commitment.
Strategic Alignment
The token allocation for My Neighbor Alice appears to be strategically designed to support the game's long-term goals and incentivize various stakeholders:
[1a]
The 17.2% allocation to the Ecosystem ensures continuous development and maintenance of the game.
[1g]
The 8% allocation to Play to Earn encourages player participation, which is crucial for the game's success.
[1h]
The 15% allocation to Marketing is essential for attracting new users and growing the game's community.
[1i]
However, without details on the vesting schedule, it is unclear how well the team and advisors are aligned with long-term project success.
Conclusion
In conclusion, My Neighbor Alice's token allocation demonstrates a strategic approach to incentivizing various stakeholders and supporting the game's long-term growth.
However, the lack of transparency regarding the vesting schedule limits the ability to fully assess its fairness and alignment with long-term project success.
The allocation is balanced among stakeholders, with significant portions dedicated to ecosystem development, player incentives, and marketing.
[1a]
The absence of detailed vesting schedule information raises questions about the long-term commitment of the team and advisors.
Further information on vesting schedules and performance-based unlocks would enable a more comprehensive evaluation of the allocation's fairness and strategic soundness.
