Critical evaluation

Tokenomics are a foundational element in Web3 gaming, dictating economic sustainability, player engagement, and ecosystem health. The research provided on Ashes of Mankind's tokenomics demonstrates a solid foundation but lacks critical details and depth in key areas, impacting its comprehensiveness. Based on the completeness rubric, the evaluation falls into the 'Average' category, as it addresses main important aspects but leaves significant gaps in vital areas.

• The research provides a clear overview of the dual-token system ($ASH and Credits) and its integration with gameplay.
  • It outlines the utility of $ASH for land acquisition, crafting, and governance, and Credits for in-game purchases.
  • However, it lacks specific data on how these tokens interact dynamically within the economy, such as exchange rates or mechanisms preventing inflation.
• While the $ASH token's limited supply of one billion is highlighted, critical details about the token unlock schedule and ongoing emissions are missing.
  • This omission makes it difficult to assess the game's long-term economic sustainability and potential inflationary risks.
  • The research also fails to elaborate on how governance mechanisms could influence future token distribution or unlock strategies.
• Token allocation and vesting schedules are mentioned broadly, but specific data on distribution percentages or vesting timelines for team members, advisors, and investors is absent.
  • This lack of transparency prevents a full evaluation of fairness and alignment of incentives with long-term project success.
  • The role of Arcanum Ventures is noted, but their specific contributions to tokenomics design are not detailed.
• The research does not provide a comprehensive analysis of Ultra blockchain's scalability, environmental impact, or interoperability with other chains.
  • While Ultra's user-friendly features and security are highlighted, there is no discussion of how its architecture handles potential growth in transaction volume or environmental concerns.
  • This gap limits the ability to fully assess Ultra's suitability for long-term use in Ashes of Mankind.
• The evaluation of smart contracts and wallet infrastructure focuses on security and user experience but lacks depth on fail-safe mechanisms and long-term maintenance plans.
  • While the contracts are noted as audited and open-source, there is no discussion of how they will evolve with the game's needs or ensure compliance with future regulatory requirements.

Follow-up questions

How does the $ASH token unlock schedule ensure long-term economic sustainability?

• Without understanding the unlock schedule, stakeholders cannot evaluate how the game will manage inflation, incentivize early adopters, or maintain token value over time, which is critical for long-term viability.

What specific measures are in place to prevent whale dominance or speculative behavior in the token economy?

• The absence of details on anti-whale mechanisms or speculative controls raises concerns about economic fairness and the risk of market manipulation, which could undermine player trust and engagement.

How does Ultra blockchain's architecture address scalability and environmental impact as the game grows?

• Without information on scalability and environmental policies, stakeholders cannot assess whether Ultra is sustainable for a growing player base or aligns with broader environmental goals, which is increasingly important in Web3 gaming.

What are the specific roles and responsibilities of Arcanum Ventures in designing the token economy?

• Understanding the contributions of external partners like Arcanum Ventures is essential for evaluating the depth of expertise and strategic planning behind the tokenomics, which impacts the project's credibility and long-term success.

How do smart contracts in Ashes of Mankind ensure fail-safe mechanisms and adaptability to future regulatory changes?

• The absence of details on fail-safe mechanisms and regulatory compliance limits the ability to assess the robustness of the smart contract infrastructure, which is critical for protecting players and ensuring legal adherence.