The token allocation is mostly fair, with 33% allocated to community rewards and 20% to the team and advisors, which aligns with project goals.
However, specific vesting schedules for the team and advisors are not detailed, decreasing transparency and alignment with industry standards.
The lack of detailed performance-based unlocks and measures to ensure team commitment raises concerns about long-term alignment.
While some measures (e.g., staking, buy-back & burn) discourage token dumping, the absence of explicit safeguards for early investors diminishes trust.
Communication around token allocation is adequate but lacks detail on vesting schedules and updates, reducing overall transparency.
Introduction
Token allocation and vesting schedules are critical components of sustainable Web3 gaming economies, ensuring fair distribution and long-term alignment of stakeholder interests.
In the case of Citizen Conflict, the tokenomics structure is designed to incentivize long-term engagement while balancing the needs of various stakeholders, including the team, investors, and the community.
This report will cover:
The distribution of tokens among different stakeholders, including the team, advisors, and the community.
[1a][2a]
The vesting strategies in place to align team incentives with the game's long-term success.
The measures taken to ensure transparency and fairness in the token distribution process.
Community-Focused Token Allocation
Citizen Conflict's token allocation system is designed to reward a diverse range of stakeholders, with a significant emphasis on the community and long-term ecosystem growth.
The largest portion of tokens, 33%, is allocated to community rewards, reflecting a strong commitment to empowering players and active participants in the ecosystem.
[1b]The token allocation is distributed as follows:
Community Rewards & Acquisition: 33% (247,500,000.00 tokens)
[1c]
Public Sale and Airdrops: 1.16% (8,700,000.00 tokens)
[1h]
Aligning Team Incentives
While specific vesting schedules for the team and advisors are not detailed in the provided sources, the 20% allocation to the team and advisors suggests a significant level of commitment to the project.
[1d]The tokenomics structure includes mechanisms such as staking and buy-back & burn, which are designed to encourage long-term engagement and reduce the risk of token dumping.
[2b]Additional information on the following would provide further clarity on the alignment of team incentives:
The vesting schedule for team and advisor tokens, including whether it is linear or graded and whether it includes a cliff period.
Performance-based unlocks for team tokens, if any.
Measures to ensure team commitment throughout the vesting period, such as milestone-based releases.
Transparency and Fairness
Citizen Conflict's token distribution appears to prioritize transparency and fairness, with a significant portion of tokens allocated to community rewards and staking programs.
[1c]The allocation system is designed to reward active participation and long-term engagement, as seen in the 4.54% allocation to staking and the 1.16% allocation to public sale and airdrops.
[1e][1h]However, further details on the following would enhance the transparency of the token distribution process:
The criteria for community rewards and airdrops, including how they are calculated and distributed.
The process for communicating updates or changes to the token allocation and vesting schedule.
Measures to prevent token dumping by early investors or advisors.
Conclusion
Citizen Conflict's token allocation and vesting schedule demonstrate a commitment to long-term ecosystem growth and community empowerment, though further details would enhance transparency.
Key strengths include the significant allocation to community rewards and staking, which incentivizes active participation and long-term engagement.
[1c][1e]Areas for improvement include the lack of detailed vesting schedules and performance-based incentives for the team and advisors.
Community rewards account for 33% of the total token supply, reflecting a strong focus on empowering players and active ecosystem participants.
[1c]
The staking program (4.54%) and public sale/airdrops (1.16%) further incentivize long-term engagement and community participation.
[1e][1h]
Additional information on vesting schedules, performance-based unlocks, and measures to prevent token dumping would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the tokenomics structure.
